The Evolution of the Idea of God: An Inquiry Into the Origins of Religions — Inside the Classic
Edition facts
The Evolution of the Idea of God: An Inquiry Into the Origins of Religions — Inside the Classic can be approached with a clearer sense of reading commitment from its source measurements: 158,609 words, 11 hr 30 min estimated reading time, and 20 detected text sections.
The text analysis averages about 29.0 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.
Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Religion,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.
Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.
How this score is calculated
- Description quality20 pts
- Title & short description10 pts
- Source metadata20 pts
- Text length15 pts
- Chapters / structure15 pts
- EPUB file integrity20 pts
Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.
Read the Text
ossess monumental evidence.” And quite naturally, for in antique times gods had ruled in Egypt, whose successor the king was: and the kings before Menes were significantly known as “the successors of Horus.” As late as the times of the Ptolemies, we saw, there were priests of Menes and other Pharaohs of the most ancient dynasties. The pyramid kings took the title of the Golden Horus, afterwards copied by their descendants; and from Chafra onward the reigning monarch was known as the Son of Ra and the Great God. Amenophis IL, during his own lifetime, is “a god good like Ra, the sacred seed of Amen, the son whom he begot.” And on all the monuments the king is represented of the same superhuman stature as the gods themselves: he converses with them on equal terms; they lead him by the hand into their inmost sanctuaries, or present him with the symbols of royal rule and of eternal life, like friends of the family.
The {173}former guerdon bestows upon him the same rank they themselves had held on earth; the latter advances him to share with them the glories of the other existence. In the temple of Kurneh, Rameses I. (then dead) receives the offerings and liturgies of his royal grandson. Hard by, Rameses II. offers to Amen-ra, Khonso, and Rameses I., without distinction of divinity. On the side wall, Sethi I. receives similar divine honours from the royal hands: while in the centre chamber Sethi himself officiates before the statue of his father placed in a shrine. The King is thus but the Living God: the God is thus but the Dead King.
I conclude, therefore, that a large part of the greater Egyptian gods--the national or local gods, as opposed to those worshipped by each family in its own necropolis--were early kings, whose myths were later expanded into legends, rationalised into nature-worship, and adorned by priestly care with endless symbolical or esoteric fancies. But down to the very latest age of independence, inscriptions of the god Euergetes, and the goddess Berenice, or representations like that at Philæ, of the god Philadelphus suckled by Isis, show that to the Egyptian mind the gulf between humanity and divinity was very narrow, and that the original manhood of all the deities was an idea quite familiar to priests and people.
There was, however, another class of gods about which we can be somewhat less certain; these are the animal-gods and animal-headed gods which developed out of the totems of the various villages. Such bestial types, Professor Sayce remarks, “take us back to a remote prehistoric age, when the religious creed of Egypt,” say rather, the custom of Egypt, “was still totemism.” But in what precise relation totemism stood to the main line of the evolution of gods I do not feel quite so sure in my own mind as does Mr. Herbert Spencer. It seems to me possible that the totem may in its origin have been merely the lucky-beast or badge of a particular tribe (like the regimental {174}goat or deer); and that from being at first petted, domesticated, and to some extent respected on this account, it may have grown at last, through a confusion of ideas, to share the same sort of divine honours which were paid to the ghosts of ancestors and the gods evolved from them. But Mr. Frazer has suggested a better origin of totemism from the doctrine of the Separable Soul, which is, up to date, the best explanation yet offered of this obscure subject. Be that as it may, if the totems were only gradually elevated into divinities, we can easily understand Mr. Renouf’s remark that the long series of tombs of the Apis bulls at Sakkarah shows “how immeasurably greater the devotion to the sacred animals was in the later times than in the former.”
May I add that the _worship_ of totems, as distinct from the mere _care_ implied by Mr. Frazer’s suggestion, very probably arose from the custom of carving the totem-animal of the deceased on the grave-stake or grave-board? This custom is still universal among the Indian tribes of Northwestern America.
Grant Allen opens his inquiry by distinguishing two competing schools of religious thought—humanists and animists—and positions his work as an attempt to reconcile them. He proposes to trace the belief in a god from its earliest origins in primitive minds to its fullest expression in Christian theology, emphasizing a constructive rather than destructive method. The preface frames the entire investigation around a single psychological question: by what successive steps did humans come to conceive of a deity? Allen explicitly sets aside questions of validity, focusing instead on the inevitability of these ideas given humanity's relation to the external universe.
From Dead Ancestors to Living Gods
Allen's central thesis emerges clearly in the middle excerpts: godhead springs from the primitive dead man. He argues that early kings were considered gods by descent from deified ancestors, a belief he traces through Egyptian, Peruvian, Mexican, Chinese, and Parthian examples. The Pharaoh's essential divinity is a prime article of faith among Pyramid-builders, and even later Greek dynasties retained the title of god or goddess. Allen draws heavily on Frazer's work but offers a distinct interpretation—where Frazer sees animistic origins, Allen insists that the dead ancestor is the root. This divergence shapes the entire argument, as he repeatedly grounds divine status in lineage from the deceased.
The Incarnation as a Logical Outcome
Allen treats the Christian incarnation as the culmination of a long chain of reasoning. He states that in ancient Egypt, 'the God was the Dead King, the King was the Living God,' a formula he applies broadly. The inference that children of gods are themselves divine appears in many cultures, especially early despotisms. The Mexican kings swore to make the sun shine and rain fall, a promise Allen links to their status as children of the Sun. He notes that the Chinese emperor is held responsible for droughts. These examples build toward his claim that Christianity's incarnation was not a novel idea but a résumé of common Mediterranean cults, cosmopolitanizing religion by absorbing central and universal elements.
Gods by Inspiration and Possession
Beyond hereditary divinity, Allen identifies a second class of gods: those made divine by inspiration or indwelling of a spirit. He describes the germ-idea of divine possession, where a ghost or god temporarily inhabits a living person. This concept broadens the scope of his inquiry beyond royal lineages to include shamans, prophets, and oracles. The excerpts suggest that Allen sees this as a parallel path to godhood, one that coexists with descent-based divinity. His treatment of possession as a 'germ-idea' indicates he views it as an early and persistent element in religious evolution, though the excerpts do not reveal how fully he develops this strand.
Method and Scope in a Vast Synthesis
Allen acknowledges that his synthesis depends heavily on predecessors, citing Frazer extensively while offering his own interpretive twist. The problem divides into three parts: the origin of polytheism, the elimination of most gods leading to monotheism, and the rise of Christianity as a universalizing force. His method is comparative, drawing on savage beliefs, historical documents, and ancient monuments. The excerpts show a careful balance between acknowledging debts and asserting originality. Readers should note that Allen's argument is cumulative across twenty chapters, and the excerpts provide only glimpses of his full chain of reasoning. The preface's promise to be constructive rather than destructive sets a tone of explanatory ambition rather than polemic.
Allen's work rewards readers who attend to his repeated distinction between humanist and animist schools, as this framing underpins every chapter. The excerpts reveal a writer deeply engaged with Frazer's data but committed to a different explanatory model. First-time readers may find it useful to track how Allen defines 'godhead' in each cultural example, noting whether the origin is a dead ancestor or a possessing spirit. The book's length—over 158,000 words—means that the excerpts represent only a fraction of the evidence marshaled; patience with the comparative method will yield a clearer picture of his overall argument.
The rain drummed on the windowsill as I finished Grant Allen's careful argument, how every god was once a remembered grandfather. That familial thread stayed with me, tugging somewhere quieter. Later, I drifted to another shelf and found Mystics and Saints of Islam — A Closer Reading. The names were unfamiliar, but the ache wasn’t. Same human longing, just a different voice praying in the dark.
Samuel Martin
1 month ago-
Michael Robertson - 1 month ago
The Evolution of the Idea of God offers a wide-ranging survey, but at times it feels overly ambitious. The chapters on ancient religions are insightful, yet the later sections rush through modern developments. Still, it's a valuable read for those curious about comparative religion, if you can overlook the occasional digressions and repetitive points. -
Anna Holt - 1 month ago
An enlightening journey into the origins of religious thought. The author's interdisciplinary approach, drawing from anthropology, philosophy, and history, provides a comprehensive understanding of how the idea of God evolved. The prose is engaging and accessible, making complex concepts understandable. This book challenged my perspectives and deepened my appreciation for humanity's spiritual quest. Highly recommended for both believers and skeptics. -
Jerry Martin - 1 week ago
Despite the promising title, this book disappoints. The writing is dense and academic, often losing the reader in obscure details. The author's evolutionary framework is reductionistic, oversimplifying the complexity of religious phenomena. There is little engagement with contemporary scholarship, making it feel outdated. For an accessible introduction, look elsewhere.
Your personal reading reflection
Build a private reading journal entry for this title.
Elijah Smith
4 weeks ago